• Users Online: 16
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 32  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 88-93

Ophthalmology training in Greece as perceived by resident ophthalmologists in the times of crisis: A national, questionnaire-based survey


2nd Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece

Date of Submission11-Aug-2019
Date of Decision06-Oct-2019
Date of Acceptance16-Oct-2019
Date of Web Publication23-Mar-2020

Correspondence Address:
Ioannis Tsinopoulos
2nd Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Papageorgiou General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki Ring Road, 564 03 Thessaloniki, Macedonia
Greece
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.1016/j.joco.2019.10.001

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 


Purpose: To assess the level of perceived satisfaction with the current level of ophthalmology training in Greece from the perspective of residents and to identify deficiencies in the training curriculum.
Methods: This is a prospective, cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. An online, semi-structured questionnaire was designed to evaluate ophthalmology residents' extent of satisfaction with the quality of their postgraduate medical training. The survey was divided in two parts: demographics and evaluation of training. Resident ophthalmologists in all teaching hospitals in Greece were contacted and encouraged to complete it.
Results: A response rate of 53.8% was achieved. Two out of three participants stated their disappointment with the quality of training they received and deemed the four-year residency training program as insufficient. Surgical training was also viewed as unsatisfactory by the majority of the respondents. An interest in subspecialty training, as well as a significant participation in research activities, was noted.
Conclusions: Both training and overall satisfaction with working conditions must be improved to preserve the appeal of ophthalmology for young academics. A new, structured curriculum, reduction of unnecessary bureaucracy, and improved surgical training rank among the most essential priorities in order to improve postgraduate ophthalmology training.

Keywords: Ophthalmology trainees, Postgraduate training, Questionnaire


How to cite this article:
Lamprogiannis L, Tzamalis A, Tsaousis KT, Ziakas N, Symeonidis C, Karamitsos A, Dimitrakos S, Tsinopoulos I. Ophthalmology training in Greece as perceived by resident ophthalmologists in the times of crisis: A national, questionnaire-based survey. J Curr Ophthalmol 2020;32:88-93

How to cite this URL:
Lamprogiannis L, Tzamalis A, Tsaousis KT, Ziakas N, Symeonidis C, Karamitsos A, Dimitrakos S, Tsinopoulos I. Ophthalmology training in Greece as perceived by resident ophthalmologists in the times of crisis: A national, questionnaire-based survey. J Curr Ophthalmol [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Nov 24];32:88-93. Available from: http://www.jcurrophthalmol.org/text.asp?2020/32/1/88/281245




  Introduction Top


Since 2009, Greece has been facing an unprecedented fiscal crisis that has led the government to undertake strict austerity measures including public sector cuts. The ongoing crisis has heavily affected the Greek National Health System (GNHS).[1] Weaknesses in organization and management,[2] understaffing,[3] and cuts in health expenditure, which have often led to lack of surgical equipment,[4] have affected the quality of health that is currently being offered in GNHS hospitals. As postgraduate medical training in Greece is exclusively conducted in public teaching hospitals, it is important to determine to what extent its quality has also been influenced by the crisis.

Ophthalmology residency training in Greece lasts four years and is conducted both in university and non-university departments. The Greek Ministry of Health determines the number of residency training posts in each department according to its total workload and activity. The lack of a common, national, structured training program leads to a great diversity as to the quality of training that is currently offered in Greek teaching hospitals. Residents' theoretical knowledge and clinical skills are assessed after the completion of their training with written and oral exams that are held six times a year and lead to the acquisition of the specialist title. However, quality of training is not being assessed from the residents' perspective.

Questionnaire-based surveys have been conducted in a number of countries to assess ophthalmology residents' perceptions of the quality of training they receive, producing interesting results.[5],[6],[7],[8],[9] Clinical knowledge, surgical competence, and development of the doctor-patient relationship were among the main fields that were assessed. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first time that the quality of ophthalmology specialty training in Greece is being assessed by residents with the use of anonymous questionnaires.


  Methods Top


A semi-structured questionnaire consisting of 19 questions was designed to assess resident ophthalmologists' degree of satisfaction with current status of ophthalmology training in Greece. The study was conducted in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the local Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee. The questionnaire, which was divided into two parts, demographics and evaluation of training, was available online and could be completed anonymously. Only one submission per respondent was allowed. No incentives were offered to improve response rate. Questions were taken or adapted from existing validated questionnaires.

The survey was available in the Greek and English languages after double and back translation. In particular, 2 separate forward translations by translators who are native speakers of the target language (English) were performed and, thereafter, 2 separate back translations by translators who are native speakers of the source language (Greek). The translation produced a questionnaire which was not only comparable in terms of language (linguistic equivalence) but conceptually comparable (conceptual equivalence) as well. The English version of the applied questionnaire is displayed in [Table 1].
Table 1: Questionnaire as it was applied

Click here to view


Resident ophthalmologists in all teaching hospitals in Greece were invited to participate in the survey. After contacting the competent institutions and careful review of the appropriate lists, 290 residents in 58 ophthalmology departments of 54 hospitals in Greece were informed through telephone and e-mail as to the survey and were encouraged to access the related site and to complete the questionnaire. Related contact information was provided by the Greek Ministry of Health and ophthalmological societies. The data were collected between February 10, 2014, and April 7, 2014.

Responses to the survey were initially coded in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (Microsoft Office 2007, Microsoft Corp.) for analysis. Frequency data were tabulated and used for descriptive statistics. Statistical analysis was performed with Medcalc statistical software (version 9.3.0.0, Medcalc, Mariakerke, Belgium) and SPSS (v. 17.0 for Windows, SPSS INC, Chicago, IL). The data are given as mean ± standard deviation. Normality was checked using the Kolmogorove-Smirnov test. Due to the fact that data were not in all cases normally distributed, both parametric and non-parametric methods were used. All P values were 2-sided and were considered statistically significant when less than 0.05. Chi-square test was used.


  Results Top


One hundred fifty-six questionnaires were anonymously completed giving a response rate of 53.8% (156/290). Eighty-five of the participants (54.5%) were men, and 71 (45.5%) were women. Mean age of the responders was 32.8 ± 4.6 years. Further demographic data are presented in [Table 2] divided into two groups: whether respondents were occupied in university and non-university ophthalmology departments.
Table 2: Main demographic data for residents in university and non-university ophthalmology departments and their respective P-value (Student's t-test, Fisher's exact test)

Click here to view


First year trainees responded at a rate of 51.5% (33/64), second year trainees responded at a rate of 52% (40/77), their third year colleagues responded at a rate of 53.3% (40/75), and final year trainees responded at a rate of 58.1% (43/75).

Only 31.4% of the participants (49/156) perceived their residency training as satisfactory while 55.8% of the participants (87/156) expressed their overall dissatisfaction with their training. Residents in university departments demonstrated a significantly higher level of satisfaction (60.8%, 31/51) in comparison with residents in non-university departments (23.8%, 25/105) (P < 0,001). 60.6% (20/33) of year 1 residents expressed their dissatisfaction, and similar results were observed in the other groups (year 2: 52.5%, 21/40, year 3: 52.5%, 21/40, year 4: 58.1%, 25/43).

Sixty two and one-fifth percent of the respondents (97/156) deemed the current four year ophthalmology residency curriculum totally or rather insufficient, without any statistically significant difference between residents in university and non-university departments (P = 0.67). Forty-one percent of the participants (64/156) stated that their department lacked a structured residency training program, and almost two thirds of them (66%, 103/156) identified books and scientific journals as the main sources of their clinical knowledge. Excessive bureaucracy was found to possibly contribute to the overall dissatisfaction of the participants, as four out of five (80.1%, 125/156) stated their belief that filling in unnecessary paperwork accounted for a significant part of their working hours. It is also noteworthy that two out of five resident ophthalmologists (40.4%, 63/156) did not believe that by the end of their four-year residency training program they would have acquired the necessary skills to start their own practice.

Surgical training was also viewed as unsatisfactory by two out of three of the respondents (66.7%, 103/156). Residents participating in this survey had performed a mean of 23.2 ± 14.3 phacoemulsification procedures, and the majority (51.9%, 81/156) had not completed any cataract removal operations at all. The number of completed phacoemulsification cases per resident was found to correlate statistically significantly with their year of training (r = 0.79, P < 0.0001), whilst residents in their last year of training were recorded to have performed a mean of 45.8 ± 17.2 phacoemulsification surgeries. Even fourth-year residents, who were approaching the end of their training, had performed a relatively low number of surgeries as a primary surgeon (mean: 45.8). Participants attributed the low number of surgeries mostly to the lack of experienced trainers (32.7%, 51/156) and lack of necessary equipment (21.8%, 34/156) other than the already mentioned limited training time (30.8%, 48/156). Consequently, the proportion of residents who are rather or very confident they would have acquired the necessary surgical skills in order to conduct unassisted cataract surgery by the end of their specialty training is relatively low (16.7%, 26/156). More details on residents' perceived surgical competency are given in [Table 3].
Table 3: Percentages of responses (and respective absolute numbers in brackets) on perceived surgical competency for residents in university and non-university ophthalmology departments

Click here to view


The final part of the questionnaire was meant to record participants' plans for the future as well as extra-curriculum research activities. Almost all of the respondents (96.8%, 151/156) considered post-residency training in an ophthalmology subspecialty a necessity. Cataract (32.7%, 51/156) and cornea (17.3%, 27/156) ranked among the most popular subspecialties, followed by medical retina, vitreoretinal diseases, glaucoma, neuro-ophthalmology, ophthalmic plastic surgery, and pediatric ophthalmology. More than three quarters of the participants (75.6%, 118/156) stated that they would be eager to pursue subspecialty training abroad.

An interest in research was demonstrated by a substantial proportion of the respondents. Nearly a quarter (25.6%, 40/156) had participated in at least one multicenter study, and more than half (52.6%, 82/156) had participated in the preparation of at least one paper that had been presented during an international congress. More than a third of respondents (34.6%, 54/156) had contributed to the preparation of at least one paper that had been published in a peer-reviewed journal.


  Discussion Top


Despite the economic crisis that has engulfed Greece and the growing strain on its health-care system, young Greek ophthalmologists perform well on their national exams and display a genuine interest in pursuing further specialization after completing their residency training program. Moreover, they demonstrate an increasing tendency to participate in the European Board of Ophthalmology (EBO) examination, which is held annually, and they contribute greatly to its soaring popularity.[10] However, this study identifies a number of perceived deficiencies in the quality of training they receive during the four years of their residency.

Ophthalmology trainees in Greece tend to be significantly older than their colleagues in other countries.[6] This difference may reasonably be attributed to the high demand for the relatively few ophthalmology training posts, which leads to long waiting lists for entry in the residency program, as there is currently no other method of selection (interview, national examinations). An ongoing discussion regarding the possible implementation of a new objective selection system has yet to produce any results.

Duration and structure of the training program rank among the main issues that need to be addressed, according to participants. The length of the residency program is deemed as insufficient by most Greek residents. Extensive bureaucracy, which is identified as one of the causes of the Greek economic crisis, also reduces available time for training, as trainees are not properly supported by administrative clerks and often need to devote a significant part of their time and energy to non-clinical tasks, which could have been undertaken by other members of staff, if staffing was adequate. It is, therefore, reasonable to expect that a longer program might provide adequate training opportunities in areas that are currently viewed as deficient. It should be noted that in a number of countries with excellent eye health care services postgraduate training lasts a minimum of five years.[11] Implementation of a new, uniform, national competency-based curriculum may also improve quality of training, as great inequalities as recorded as to the content of training residents receive in different types of hospitals. University ophthalmology departments tend to allow exposure to a wider range of ophthalmology subspecialties, which may relate to the recorded difference in levels of satisfaction between residents of university and non-university departments.

Surgical training lies on the epicenter of residents' criticism. Acquisition of a surgical skill set is fundamental to every ophthalmology training program, and it is therefore safe to assume that this perceived weakness contributes greatly to residents' overall dissatisfaction. Surgical volumes, according to participants' recordings, are inadequate, remaining far from the minimum requirement of 86 cataract surgeries as it was established by the ophthalmology Residency Review Commission (RRC) and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME),[12] even for residents approaching the completion of their training. Although residents that work in university departments maintain a relatively higher rate of satisfaction, the need for changes intended to address this weakness is clearly underlined. Greek residents do not, as a rule, receive surgical training during the primary stages of their training, which drastically limits the time they spend inside the operating room and the number of operations they undertake. A curriculum that would provide residents adequate surgical experience from the beginning of their training may lead to higher surgical volumes and, as a result, to a significant reduction of complications.[13] Wet labs[14],[15] and surgical simulators[16],[17],[18] represent valuable complementary tools, and their contribution to ophthalmic surgical training has been well documented; it is, therefore, reasonable to expect that their application in Greek training hospitals may contribute to improved results as well.

Our study demonstrates limitations. Questionnaire-based surveys rely on participants' personal assessments, which allow for a degree of subjectivity. Response rate, though consistent with that of similar studies, may also represent a potential source of bias. Furthermore, the data contain the perceptions of residents still in training, whose assessment of their overall satisfaction may change as they approach later stages of the residency program.

In conclusion, despite the perceived difficulties, Greek residents manage to maintain a creative attitude regarding their future. The vast majority of participants state their intention to pursue further specialization, with anterior segment being their main field of interest. Research and extra-curriculum activities such as participation in multicenter studies are also indicative of Greek residents' effort to improve their competency in certain clinical areas. It is safe to assume that if the Greek state were to address the weaknesses of the postgraduate medical training system, young physicians' productivity would increase significantly. Providing an environment that would allow adequate clinical and surgical training in all ophthalmology areas should be a government priority, as it ensures an effective provision of ophthalmic health-care services in Greece in the near future.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Simou E, Koutsogeorgou E. Effects of the economic crisis on health and healthcare in Greece in the literature from 2009 to 2013: A systematic review. Health Policy 2014;115:111-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Emmanouilidou M, Burke M. A thematic review and a policy-analysis agenda of Electronic Health Records in the Greek National Health System. Health Policy 2013;109:31-7.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Kentikelenis A, Karanikolos M, Papanicolas I, Basu S, McKee M, Stuckler D. Health effects of financial crisis: Omens of a Greek tragedy. Lancet 2011;378:1457-8.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Karidis NP, Dimitroulis D, Kouraklis G. Global financial crisis and surgical practice: The Greek paradigm. World J Surg 2011;35:2377-81.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Mostafaei A, Hajebrahimi S. Perceived satisfaction of ophthalmology residents with the current Iranian ophthalmology curriculum. Clin Ophthalmol 2011;5:1207-10.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Millán T, de Carvalho KM. Satisfaction with ophthalmology residency training from the perspective of recent graduates: A cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ 2013;13:75.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Ayanniyi AA, Adeboye A, Ademola-Popoola DS. Ophthalmology training in Nigeria: The trainee ophthalmologists' perspective. Niger Postgrad Med J 2007;14:94-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
  [Full text]  
8.
Meltendorf C, Ziemssen F, Arbeitsgruppe Nachwuchs der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft. Working conditions for young trainees and junior researchers in ophthalmology: Results of a recent online questionnaire. Ophthalmologe 2010;107:1176-84.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
McDonnell PJ, Kirwan TJ, Brinton GS, Golnik KC, Melendez RF, Parke DW 2nd, et al. Perceptions of recent ophthalmology residency graduates regarding preparation for practice. Ophthalmology 2007;114:387-91.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Mathysen DG, Aclimandos W, Roelant E, Wouters K, Creuzot-Garcher C, Ringens PJ, et al. History and future of the European Board of Ophthalmology Diploma examination. Acta Ophthalmol 2013;91:589-93.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Fahim AT, Simunovic MP, Mammo Z, Mitry D, Pakzad-Vaezi K, Bradley P, et al. Comparison of ophthalmic training in 6 English-speaking countries. Can J Ophthalmol 2016;51:212-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Minimum Numbers 2012. Available from: http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramResources/240_Oph_Minimum_Numbers.pdf. [Last accessed on 2019 Oct 06].  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Binenbaum G, Volpe NJ. Ophthalmology resident surgical competency: A national survey. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1237-44.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Liu EY, Li B, Hutnik CML. Canadian ophthalmic microsurgery course: An innovative spin on wet lab-based surgical education. Can J Ophthalmol 2016;51:315-20.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Henderson BA, Grimes KJ, Fintelmann RE, Oetting TA. Stepwise approach to establishing an ophthalmology wet laboratory. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:1121-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Lucas L, Schellini SA, Lottelli AC. Complications in the first 10 phacoemulsification cataract surgeries with and without prior simulator training. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2019;82:289-94.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
la Cour M, Thomsen ASS, Alberti M, Konge L. Simulators in the training of surgeons: Is it worth the investment in money and time? 2018 Jules Gonin lecture of the Retina Research Foundation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019;257:877-81.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Alwadani S. Cataract surgery training using surgical simulators and wet-labs: Course description and literature review. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2018;32:324-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed502    
    Printed35    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded43    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]